by adminrebo | Jan 31, 2019 | Business, Personal Design, Real Estate
Many realtors plummet into the pitfalls of traditional real estate advertising for their personal brands without ever asking – “Is this type of advertising the most effective use of my marketing dollars?”
While the same advertising tactics have reared their head in the industry for decades, most are not the best in terms of cost effectiveness.
We took a look at the best performing agents in the game today and outlined five of the most cost effective tactics to incorporate into your personal real estate marketing as well as which delivery platforms you should utilize in your real estate business to deploy them.
1. Personal Website
Personal websites are extremely powerful retargeting tools.
A website with a purposeful layout and valuable content is crucial to driving traffic that turns into leads. Building a website to automatically capture and nurture these leads is essential to growing a real estate brand and business in today’s digital landscape.
When a real estate website is setup properly, visitors are tagged with a pixel that allows agents to create targeted audience that can be advertised to again and again, keeping the real estate agents business and brand name at the top of the clients mind.
An incredibly strong online presence demonstrates the importance of a personal website to the top agents in the industry. Capturing leads and turning them into clients online will give even the newest (or most seasoned) real estate agents a competitive edge over other agents.
2. Social Media
Social Media allows real estate agents to connect with potential and current clients on a personal level. It is a great tool for driving traffic to a real estate agent’s personal website or even a real estate broker’s main website.
Just like the personal website mentioned above, social media gives real estate agents the ability to target hyper specific demographics and collect data on their best leads. Using this information to run ads not only generates leads for buyers but it is also a powerful way to build interest for current home listings.
Be sure to test a few different advertising techniques (test ad type and delivery method), for example, testimonial advertising on LinkedIn, valuable articles on Facebook and Twitter, and beautiful photographs of your current listings on Instagram.
Always keep track of your data and compare how each performs. Then refine your ads and target audiences accordingly.
3. Podcast
Create a podcast about your local community and home improvement projects. Potential clients listen and respond to this type of content because they are not necessarily looking for real estate-centric podcasts (whose listening base is more largely populated by other realtors).
Hyper-local informative podcasts will drive listeners from certain neighborhoods or cities to your site. Focus on the value of your content rather than the number of listeners. The more value you provide to these communities the more valuable the listenership will be when it comes time to buy or sell their homes.
4. Radio Interviews/Advertisement
This may seem like an old way to advertise with all these other digital options but running a personal brand advertisement on local radio can generate fantastic leads. We found the that the most effective advertising spots are when popular DJs personally recommend your business on the air as first person testimonials.
Other effective types of ad content for radio include talent testimonials, personal website promotions, and informing listeners to Google your name.
The “Google me” technique is particularly effective if you have an authoritative SEO score.
5. Community Events
Looking to sell in a hot neighborhood? Want to raise the value of the homes in the neighborhood of your listings? Hosting community fundraisers or events that help schools with supplies is a great way to rub elbows with the neighbors and get your name known.
Demonstrating a philanthropic inclination as a real estate agent will make clients feel a sense of attachment to an agent’s or brokerage’s charitable contributions by listing homes with those involved.
Agents can inform surrounding community members of the event by going door to door, which is a time-tested lead generating technique. However, by going door to door to promote a charitable event, real estate agents will come off as less intrusive.
Written by:
Tommy Wolf
California Licensed Realtor
tommyw@realestatebackops.com
DRE # 02044169
Streamline your transaction management today!
Drop us a line today to find out how!
Click Here
by adminrebo | Oct 15, 2018 | Business, Money, Personal Design, Real Estate
Article Highlights:
- If current household income and educational attainment rate trends continue in Washington, Ohio, and Colorado, the rate of change of median home prices in those states will greatly exceed the national average.
US News state rankings give insight into where each state stacks up in many lifestyle, political, and economic categories including health care, education, economy, opportunity, infrastructure, crime and corrections, fiscal stability, and quality of life. And while many syndicates claim to have discovered the holy grail of real estate investing in the form of an infallible algorithm, the truth is no one has a tool that can accurately predict the future of real estate prices. But in regard to the rankings assigned by US News, is there any correlation between any of these categories and real estate prices in corresponding states? We ranked each state by median home price, then performed linear regression analyses between each category and home price ranking to determine if there is in fact a correlating category that could be influencing real estate prices, and consequently, determine where real estate prices would be likely to go up based on local trends that could potentially raise a state’s ranking in relevant categories. Here’s what the numbers suggest:
OVERALL
|
R^2
Value
|
Correlation
|
Health Care
|
0.411
|
Moderate
|
Education
|
0.1685
|
Weak
|
Crime & Corrections
|
0.1355
|
Weak
|
Economy
|
0.108
|
Weak
|
Fiscal Stability
|
0.017
|
None
|
Opportunity
|
0.0115
|
None
|
Infrastructure
|
0.0001
|
None
|
Quality of Life
|
0
|
None
|
|
HEALTH CARE
|
Public Health
|
0.497
|
Moderate
|
Health Care Quality
|
0.2526
|
Weak
|
Health Care Access
|
0.0473
|
None
|
|
PUBLIC HEALTH
|
Low Obesity Rate
|
0.6135
|
Strong
|
Low Mortality Rate
|
0.5217
|
Strong
|
Low Smoking Rate
|
0.5197
|
Strong
|
Low Infant Mortality Rate
|
0.321
|
Moderate
|
Mental Health
|
0.2021
|
Moderate
|
Low Suicide Rate
|
0.0202
|
Weak
|
|
HEALTH CARE QUALITY
|
Preventable Admissions
|
0.3959
|
Moderate
|
Nursing Home Quality
|
0.1664
|
Weak
|
Medicare Quality
|
0.075
|
None
|
Fewest Hospital Readmissions
|
0.0489
|
None
|
|
HEALTH CARE ACCESS
|
Adult Dental Visits
|
0.2266
|
Weak
|
Health Care Affordability
|
0.0966
|
Weak
|
Child Dental Visits
|
0.0391
|
None
|
Health Insurance Enrollment
|
0.0179
|
None
|
Adult Wellness Visits
|
0.0163
|
None
|
Child Wellness Visits
|
0.0031
|
None
|
|
EDUCATION
|
Higher Education
|
0.1216
|
Weak
|
Pre-K – 12
|
0.0348
|
None
|
|
HIGHER EDUCATION
|
Educational Attainment
|
0.4328
|
Moderate
|
4 Yr College Grad Rate
|
0.0502
|
None
|
Low Debt At Graduation
|
0.0107
|
None
|
Tuition and Fees
|
0.0093
|
None
|
2 Yr College Grad Rate
|
0.0007
|
None
|
|
PRE-K – 12
|
NAEP Math Scores
|
0.1334
|
Weak
|
College Readiness
|
0.101
|
Weak
|
HS Grad Rate
|
0.0549
|
None
|
NAEP Reading Scores
|
0.0483
|
None
|
Preschool Enrollment
|
0.0422
|
None
|
Pre-K Quality
|
0.0017
|
None
|
|
CRIME & CORRECTIONS
|
Corrections
|
0.2097
|
Weak
|
Public Safety
|
0.0405
|
None
|
|
CORRECTIONS
|
Low Incarceration Rate
|
0.266
|
Weak
|
Sexual Violence in Prisons
|
0.0758
|
None
|
Least Juvenile Incarceration
|
0.0625
|
None
|
Low Recidivism Rate
|
0.0311
|
None
|
Equality in Jailing
|
0.0281
|
None
|
|
PUBLIC SAFETY
|
Low Violent Crime Rate
|
0.0711
|
None
|
Low Property Crime Rate
|
0.0143
|
None
|
|
ECONOMY
|
Business Environment
|
0.2464
|
Weak
|
Employment
|
0.1095
|
Weak
|
Growth
|
0.0226
|
None
|
|
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
|
Venture Capital
|
0.2572
|
Weak
|
Entrepreneurship
|
0.2347
|
Weak
|
Patent Creation
|
0.1824
|
Weak
|
Low Tax Burden
|
0.0349
|
None
|
Top Company Headquarters
|
0
|
None
|
|
EMPLOYMENT
|
Labor Force Participation
|
0.2111
|
Weak
|
Job Growth
|
0.0801
|
None
|
Low Unemployment Rate
|
0.0032
|
None
|
|
GROWTH
|
Net Migration
|
0.0458
|
None
|
GDP Growth
|
0.0387
|
None
|
Growth of Young Population
|
0.0019
|
None
|
|
FISCAL STABILITY
|
Long Term Fiscal Stability
|
0.0123
|
None
|
Short Term Fiscal Stability
|
0.0046
|
None
|
|
LONG TERM FISCAL STABILITY
|
Pension Fund Liability
|
0.0125
|
None
|
Government Credit Rating Score
|
0
|
None
|
|
SHORT TERM FISCAL STABILITY
|
Liquidity
|
0.0227
|
None
|
Budget Balancing
|
0.0015
|
None
|
|
OPPORTUNITY
|
Economic Opportunity
|
0.3323
|
Moderate
|
Equality
|
0.0217
|
None
|
|
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
|
Household Income
|
0.5576
|
Strong
|
Low Poverty Rate
|
0.3605
|
Moderate
|
Low Food Insecurity
|
0.2462
|
Weak
|
Gini Index
|
0.02
|
None
|
|
EQUALITY
|
Income Gap by Gender
|
0.2365
|
Weak
|
Employment Gap by Race
|
0.1294
|
Weak
|
Education Gap by Race
|
0.0834
|
None
|
Income Gap by Race
|
0.0504
|
None
|
Disability Employment Gap
|
0.0269
|
None
|
Employment Gap by Gender
|
0.0039
|
None
|
|
INFRASTRUCTURE
|
Internet Access
|
0.0491
|
None
|
Transportation
|
0.011
|
None
|
Energy
|
0.0085
|
None
|
|
INTERNET ACCESS
|
Broadband Access
|
0.09999
|
Weak
|
Ultra-Fast Internet Access
|
0.0226
|
None
|
|
TRANSPORTATION
|
Public Transit Usage
|
0.2968
|
Moderate
|
Commute Time
|
0.1279
|
Weak
|
Road Quality
|
0.1276
|
Weak
|
Bridge Quality
|
0.0994
|
Weak
|
|
ENERGY
|
Electricity Price
|
0.122
|
Weak
|
Power Grid Reliability
|
0.0596
|
None
|
Renewable Energy Usage
|
0.0011
|
None
|
|
QUALITY OF LIFE
|
Natural Environment
|
0.029
|
None
|
Social Environment
|
0.0087
|
None
|
|
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
|
Low Pollution Health Risk
|
0.2218
|
Weak
|
Low Industrial Toxins
|
0.1014
|
Weak
|
Urban Air Quality
|
0.0457
|
Weak
|
Drinking Water Quality
|
0.0002
|
None
|
|
SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT
|
Community Engagement
|
0.0747
|
None
|
Voter Participation
|
0.01
|
None
|
Social Support
|
0.0077
|
None
|
As you can see, very few categories demonstrate a
correlation between their rankings and median home prices with the exception of
several public health categories, household income, and educational attainment.
While this likely doesn’t suggest a direct cause and effect relationship, the
fact that there is a correlation between some categories and median home prices
alludes to a possibility for predicting where some state’s markets are likely
to outperform the national average based on which states are trending in the
positive direction for relevant categories. While there is little data on
general health trends by state over the years, it’s safe to assume that public
health is a direct product of educational attainment and household income, so
we’ll only be examining those two categories instead.
US news defines educational attainment, “The achievement of college degrees in any state is a measure of how well the educational system has prepared its citizenry for advanced study beyond high school and enabled students to succeed.” Interestingly, this refers to the quality of high schools in each state, not necessarily universities. The top-ranking states in positive change in high school education over the last three years are as follows:
PUBLIC
SCHOOL RANKINGS 2016 – 2018
State
|
Total Rank Change
|
Washington
|
28
|
Colorado
|
22
|
Ohio
|
14
|
Florida
|
13
|
Idaho
|
13
|
Minnesota
|
12
|
Oklahoma
|
12
|
Wisconsin
|
11
|
Utah
|
10
|
Wyoming
|
9
|
As for household income, here are the top ten ranking states
in greatest rate of change since 2014:
HOUSEHOLD INCOME RATE OF CHANGE SINCE 2014
Rank
|
State
|
Total Change
|
1
|
Washington
|
26%
|
2
|
Tennessee
|
24%
|
3
|
Arizona
|
22%
|
4
|
South Carolina
|
22%
|
5
|
D.C.
|
21%
|
6
|
Mississippi
|
21%
|
7
|
Indiana
|
21%
|
8
|
Colorado
|
20%
|
9
|
Alabama
|
20%
|
10
|
Ohio
|
19%
|
So, assuming these trends continue, Washington, Colorado,
and Ohio, being the only three states in the top ten in both likely influential
categories, expect the median home price to exceed the national average in
these three states in the near future. To reference descriptions and
explanations for any categories, visit https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states,
or if you have any questions or would like to see our full data lists for this
study, please contact our Director of Marketing at tommyw@realestatebackops.com.
by adminrebo | Jun 15, 2018 | Business, Money, Personal Design, Real Estate, Uncategorized
Article Highlights:
- Real estate agents waste a lot of time managing their own real estate transaction paperwork.
- Outsourcing their real estate transaction paperwork to a transaction coordination service will ultimately save them time and earn them more money.
In a typical work day, the responsibilities of a realtor may include marketing themselves on social media, cold calling potential clients, responding to emails, following up with current clients, meeting with inspectors, doing listing presentations, creating CMA’s, negotiating contract terms, etc. The list goes on and the role of the realtor is confined by blurred lines and expectations. So, what are the most important aspects of being a realtor, and how should your time be allocated to each with regard to your bottom line? While we don’t have an answer concerning how much you should be marketing where, how many hours a week should be dedicated to talking on the phone, or where your money is most effectively spent to generate leads, we have a solution to how many hours you should spend managing the transaction coordination side of your business. The short answer: 0. At first glance it may seem that you would be saving money by doing your own transaction coordination since this technically costs you nothing, but when making business decisions, you have to take opportunity cost into account. What this means is if you spent the time you currently spend on transaction coordination on your business instead, would the net gain from spending more time on your business be greater than the cost of hiring an outsourced transaction coordinator like REBO?
Take Dave for example. Dave is a high producing Realtor who handles all his own transaction coordination. He sold 12 houses last year at an average price of $250,000, working a typical 40-hour work week. With the 3% commission he earned, minus a 20% split for his brokerage, He earned $72,000. Not bad, right? And since Dave spent 15 hours each transaction doing all his own paperwork, he had no transaction coordination expenses. But would he have had the time to produce more if an outsourced transaction coordinator handled his paper work instead? He worked approximately 1920 hours (based on 40-hour work week) and sold 12 homes, meaning each home was the equivalent of 160 hours of work. He spent 15 hours on each transaction, adding up to 180 hours total. So, if he had hired an outsourced transaction coordinator instead, it stands to reason he would have sold 13 homes instead of 12 and had 20 hours more free time to spare. Based on these numbers, if he had chosen to hire REBO, he would have had an income of $78,000 minus REBO’s $250/transaction charge, coming to $74,750. So, he would have worked 20 hours less and earned an additional $2,750 by switching to REBO. Use our formula to determine how much you would save by switching to REBO:
C = current income/year
D = total work hours/year (1920 based on 40-hour work week)
X = number of transactions/year
Y = average hours spent on transaction coordination/transaction
Income with REBO
C/(1-((X*Y)/D)) – 250*X
Written by:
Tommy Wolf
California Licensed Realtor
tommyw@realestatebackops.com
DRE # 02044169